However, there are also products to evaluate different dimensions of the fresh student-professor relationships (e

One of the tool suitable for the latest evaluation of student-professor dating when you look at the schools was Pianta’s College student-Teacher Dating Level (STRS; Pianta, 1992). The new STRS is suitable to own educators of children amongst the decades off 3 and you will 8, is made up by 28 situations (Pianta, 2001), plus the size could have been commonly confirmed and you can recognized for those age groups (Doumen ainsi que al., 2009). This scale is actually interpreted, adapted and used in multiple regions therefore seems to be a reliable and you may good measure of the fresh new college student-professor matchmaking a number of American (elizabeth.grams., Pianta, 2001; Webb Neuharth-Pritchett, 2011) and you will European countries (e.grams., Beyazkurk Kesner, 2005; Drugli Hjemdal, 2013; Fraire, Longobardi, Prino, Sclavo, Settanni, 2013; Garcia ; Koomen, Verschueren, van Schooten, Jak, Pianta, 2012; Tsigilis Gregoriadis, 2008). This research have shown that the STRS have enough psychometric properties, though small changes (i.elizabeth., particular affairs was got rid of, modified although some changed subscale) needed to be built in acquisition in order to adjust the dimensions to each framework (Sclavo, Prino, Fraire, Longobardi, 2012). Including, inside Greece two affairs have been removed (Gregoriadis Tsigilis, 2008); inside Italy half a dozen issues was basically eliminated (Fraire et al., 2013); plus in holland the brand new version of your scale provided the brand new elimination of four totally new things and the advent of five the newest factors, together with article writers concluded that the newest adapted dependence measure presented large interior consistencies compared to unique measure (Koomen mais aussi al., 2012).

g., Class Ecosystem Measure (Moos Trickett, 2002); More youthful Kid’s Appraisals of Professor Support (Mantzicopoulos Pritchett, 2003); Teacher-College student Matchmaking Catalog (Ang, 2005); Student’s rely upon educators scale (Adams Forsyth, 2009); My children and you will Family members–Boy (Reid, Landesman, Treder, Jaccard, 1989); Ideas On the University (Essex, 1997)), STRS is actually chose since it is widely used and confirmed inside Western and you will European countries. As such, it measure allows making use of a common vocabulary to have training teacher-child relationships and you will evaluating findings (Tsigilis Gregoriadis, 2008). Additionally, even though the size tends to be susceptible to social desirability prejudice, it offers the advantage of getting advice for the dyad, it is coordinated along with other actions regarding matchmaking high quality (Y-CATS; Spilt, Koomen, Mantzicopoulos, 2010), and there is and additionally average agreement between professor account and observer accounts (Doumen, Koomen, Buyse, Wouters, Verschueren, 2012). The overlap between more viewpoints (elizabeth.grams., professor, child, classmates, and observers) means that this new teacher’s look at STR isn’t purely subjective, particularly for the brand new closeness and you may dispute scales, if you’re to your dependence measure a great deal more research is nevertheless requisite (Doumen mais aussi al., 2009).

The new disagreement scale methods the levels to which a teacher feel a poor and you will conflicting matchmaking, discordant relations, and you may a lack of experience of students

Into the share, the 3 dimensional design of STRS were established in products out of other countries, and All of us (Pianta, 2001); Brazil (Barbosa mais aussi al., 2011), Greece (Gregoriadis Tsigilis, 2008), Italy (Fraire ainsi que al., 2013), Netherlands (Koomen, Verschueren, Pianta, 2007; Koomen mais aussi al., 2012) cybermen sınavları, Norway (Drugli Hjemdal, 2013), Portugal (Abreu-Lima, Cadima, Silva, 2008), Chicken (Beyazkurk Kesner, 2005), and you may The country of spain (Garcia ), but there are numerous inconsistencies, particularly to the dependency subscale, ergo cross cultural replication has been warranted (Spilt ainsi que al., 2012; Sclavo et al., 2012).

Which measure was made to measure the overall top-notch the fresh new student-teacher matchmaking, and also the dating activities in terms of argument, closeness and you will dependence (Pianta, 2001)

When researching brand new feeling out of programs at the level or having higher trials, the size of the shape may be sensed an obstacle, specially when applied along with other procedures. Ergo, Pianta arranged a shortened sort of the latest STRS (STRS-SF, Pianta, 1992), which demands less time to accomplish. The brand new STRS-SF procedures all round quality of new student-teacher matchmaking, additionally the beginner-professor dating with respect to disagreement and you can closeness, which can be created by fifteen things. The closeness scale methods the levels that an instructor experience love, love, and you may discover correspondence with a student. The overall scale actions the amount that a teacher has a great connection with the newest beginner, we.age. a love that have reasonable disagreement and you may higher intimacy.

× Obraťte se na nás, rádi Vám poradíme..